Rejoinder on Free Will, Determinism, Libertarianism and Austrian Economics

Authors

Keywords
Free Will, Determinism, Libertarianism, Austrian Economics

Summary
Block (2015) claimed that the free will position is correct, that of determinism incorrect, and that libertarianism and Austrian economics are compatible with the former but not the latter. Edelstein, Wenzel and Salcido (2016) criticized Block (2015) on the grounds that. The present paper is a rejoinder to EWS. It argues that determinism is incorrect; that free will is correct, and that freedom of will is important for both Austrian economics and libertarianism.

JEL: B, Z
Pages: 15
DOI: 

More titles

  • The Online Store – Features in Accounting and Tax Aspects of Activity

    This paper is an attempt, based on the nature and legal framework of the online store, to define the accounting and taxation issues of its business. For the purpose, the paper discusses the specificities of fiscal reporting of: a domain, a website and online store software products, delivery of goods and their release /signing out/, costs related ...

  • Insurance "Professional Liability" for Insurance Intermediaries

    This paper indicates various requirements for maintaining the insurance "Professional Liability", for insurance intermediaries, by comparing a number of features of the repealed and current regulations. The article considers how various forms of transformation into trade and legal nature, for insurance broker, influence the insurance held by him. ...

  • The Human Being in Economy – Rational (Irrational) and Instinctive

    The study examines the human being in economy. The shared opinion is that the theory of economics should study the human being in economy rather than the Íomo economicus. The maintained view is that the accepted concept in the neoclassical theory about Íomo economicus according to which human beings are rational does not correspond to the ...